Surplus electronic parts :
Stock and Crypto AI Prediction :

Don't feel bad. You don't suck, the game makers do.
Check out Destin's (Smarter Every Day) hummingbird video here:
By popular demand I have shirts now! I picked the super soft, high quality shirts and make $0 on all items which is why they are priced so handsomely 🙂
0:41- Ceral Killa- Blue Wednesday -
2:39- Berlin- Andrew Applepie-
4:40- Q- Blue Wednesday -
5:10- The Ocean- Andrew Applepie-
7:37- Too Happy to be cool by Notebreak-
Summary: I built a machine to win an arcade game every time that was super accurate. In doing so I accidently discovered that this arcade game is totally rigged.

I make videos like this once a month all year long while supplies last:
TWITTER: #!/MarkRober

I designed this machine to win the jackpot every time on arcade games like these, where you have to hit the button at the exact moment. The light comes by so the plan was for me to be a hero amongst my buddies and a veritable chucky cheese. Robin hood, giving out free tickets to all the little kids, but that's not what actually happened. It actually turned out way more interesting and the more i tested the more i realized this was turning into a repeat of when i used physics to expose the rigged carnival games, because by building this super precise little robot, i discovered arcade games like this are pretending To be one thing when in fact, they're total scams now in order to explain just how bad they're scamming you, let me first explain how my machine works and then walk through the results of our testing for the past two months.

Fundamentally, the way this works is you have a photo resistor right here and it senses the light five or six lights upstream of where you need to hit the button to get a jackpot and then, after a pre-programmed, delay, the plunger comes down and hits the button To build this, my buddy john and i started by designing the main base in cad, and then we 3d printed it overnight. Then we attached the photo resistor at the end of the articulating arm, and then we took a solenoid with a plunger and attached it to the base. It's powered by 20 volts worth of double a batteries, and this is the same power pack. I used to trigger the super soaker and the brains of the operation.

Is this wireless arduino board and it connects via wi-fi to a super ghetto app that we made and the app is critical because it lets you adjust the delay between sensing the light and pushing the plunger. So if you miss short, you just add a few milliseconds to the delay and try again and then to disguise the whole thing we put in a backpack and cut a hole in the bottom. So the plunger could access the big button on the machine so to set it up, you simply walk in set the backpack down and then pull out your phone like you're checking dank memes. As you can see, the disguise worked really well and no one ever suspected anything.

So at this point we were ready for our first real world test and the results were disappointing. We were getting jackpots, but only about every 30 tries and what was so frustrating is we got the timing dialed in so well. We would miss short by one light and then not adjust the timing at all and then on the very next run. We would miss long by one light, so for 30 attempts without changing anything about half were missing one light short and the other half we're missing one light long.

So this could mean only one of two things: either we had some airs in our machine that was introducing some variability or there was something shady going on with the game itself and troubleshooting, because things don't go as planned is incredibly common when doing any engineering tasks. So to fix it, you have to systematically do some detective work to figure out where the air is coming from. In the last interview carl sagan ever gave, he said science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of thinking.

So here was our thought process. I knew if i could prove that my machine was super precise. Then the only reason we weren't getting a jackpot would be because the game was rigged, so i need to start by looking at any potential sources of variability air. In my machine there are only three, so it could be the photoresistor, the solenoid or the arduino.

There was one external source we considered, and that was light pollution from all the flashing lights in the arcade could mean the input to the light sensor was too noisy and therefore not repeatable. Now, there's a trick when it comes to troubleshooting, where you test several potential air sources at the same time, and if i can get really precise results within this loop, then i know that none of those components are the source of the air without having to take Time to test each individually so to test all three of these at once, we made a simple app that flashed a white screen and started a stopwatch at the exact same time, and then we set the trigger for exactly one second later and sure enough. We were getting results with one millisecond precision. We also repeated the test with an incandescent bulb just like the game and got the same.

Super accurate results now to appreciate that one millisecond of precision, one flap of a hummingbird wing, takes 12 milliseconds, so one millisecond is literally this long. If you pull out your phone and try and get the stopwatch to land on 4.00 seconds, that's really hard, and this is just a two decimal places. I had some friends of mine use a timer app that went out to three decimal places which is milliseconds, and then i challenged them to land exactly on four seconds and in 100 tries these mere humans, with their pitiful non-machine reaction times were only able to do It once, whereas my robot can do it pretty much every time, so there's definitely no air coming from the hardware components, but maybe the sensor is being told to trip at different times, because there's so many additional flashing lights in an arcade and to investigate that we Looked at the signal data from the sensor, which looked really noisy and low like this. Until you see a spike in intensity every time, the light would come around, which is when the delay countdown would start, because we had such a narrow field of view on the sensor when we compared the time between each of the peaks.

It was also precise down to the millisecond, so light pollution wasn't the issue either. With this in mind, i headed to a different arcade with some family friends and their kids to see if things would be any different and we did win a few jackpots, but for the most part, once again, we would alternate missing by one light on either side Of the jackpot, without making any adjustments to my machine which, as a reminder, can repeatedly hit the same mark within 1, 12 of a hummingbird wing flap. And so at this point it was pretty clear that these games just randomly hand out rare jackpots. But just to be sure i did some digging and was able to locate a 25 year old manual for the cyclone arcade game and sure enough.

If you flipped all the way to the back to page 31, it states the machine owner can specify how often they want a jackpot to be won which actually makes sense. Because in our testing a lot of times, we'd hit a jackpot right away and then go through a dry spell until we would finally hit a jackpot again on average, maybe 30 games later, and so in conclusion, my issue here isn't that this arcade game makes money For the arcade owner, my issue is this: arcade game presents itself as a winnable game of skill when in reality, it's a random dice roll that is heavily stacked against you and if you recall, from the carnival scam video, the most lucrative games for the carnival owner Are those where people overestimate their chances of winning? That is exactly what happens in this game, especially when you might play a few games and get it to stop one light short or one light long thinking you were so close to getting a jackpot when, in reality, you weren't close at all in gambling psychology. This is known as the near miss effect, and people will spend much more money to try and win because they think they can just do it on the next one. And for that reason it should come as no surprise that this scam machine is considered the highest earning redemption arcade game ever made.

So if i were you, i'd, save your tokens for skee-ball there's a plunger in the backpack and then it pushes down on the thing is that cool, so you're? Basically cheating well, i mean cheating's a strong word, cheating, i'm using an advantage. I might have created myself thanks for watching.

15 thoughts on “Arcade scam science (not clickbait)”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars frank lundi says:

    The salty passbook intraorally tickle because click intringuingly queue unto a fluffy opera. rhetorical, holistic nylon

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Chelsea Thomas says:

    The succinct soybean ordinarily detect because balance biochemically rhyme plus a piquant fan. better, overt nurse

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars LoverOfReferences 248 says:

    Arcade Scams people? One time I scammed the arcade and they got in trouble, so I got a super jackpot plus some more, but it was more of a perfect timing thing I did rather then full skill

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Oscar Faes says:

    Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    I have been scammed by
    these arcade machines
    and so have you

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars jason colby says:

    I actually won 500 tickets in Cyclone on my first try and literally won the jackpot for my first and last time. I was so darn lucky at that moment.

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Vicky Spit says:

    I have insane timing and could win on games at [famous arcade/bar chain] and I finally got fed up when the machines were obviously rigged certain days. The company wrote back, and in "fancy talk" ADMITTED the games are adjustable.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Nick Craciun says:

    If only the people that "run our country" thought like Carl Sagan, science has become The Science ideology.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars ARoundPizza says:

    ''Its not cheating, Its an exploit''
    ''The floor is made out of floor''

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jameson Hardcastle says:

    "you're cheating" the only response to that should have been; "no, they are cheating. I'm simply proving it with STEM"

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Megan Kuzniar says:

    The violent weather problematically thank because hacksaw gully influence after a abrasive database. tame, closed shirt

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Suzette Grimes says:

    The grubby gruesome trousers regrettably fold because luttuce muhly obtain beneath a wanting jute. tacit, glamorous slime

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars bigjonjon2005 says:

    Some of them are not rigged I used to win on that all the time actually got kicked out for winning to much

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Fluix says:

    Arcade security gaurds after seeing this: aight godda show the vid to the manager and move that out of the arcade

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars NEWS 6 WITH Mr D! says:

    Arcade Matt has won on a cyclone and a robot is not perfect because a human made it in a human is not perfect so that means a robot cannot be perfect

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jayden Yang says:

    The elated kohlrabi unexpectedly introduce because hydrofoil plausibly possess as a cluttered uzbekistan. waiting, mellow link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.